Case Study
Wise Investment Calcutta Hc Section 68 Nr Portfolio
Landmark Court Judgment Analysis
Wise Investment Calcutta Hc Section 68 Nr Portfolio needs detailed legal review and fact-matching before you rely on it. Compare top compliance and legal experts on the WorkIndex work index.
Post Your Requirement - FreeLast fact-checked: 2026-06-26
Duplicate checked
Official-source cautious
India specific
Dispute Details
Facts & Lower Court History
- Facts: The Assessing Officer made tax additions u/s 68 on share premium received by a company, relying on the Delhi High Court's NR Portfolio judgment to demand source-of-source verification.
- Lower Court History: The ITAT deleted the addition. The Revenue appealed to the Calcutta High Court in PCIT v. Wise Investment Pvt. Ltd.
- Key Issues: Whether the strict source-of-source verification required under Section 68 applies universally, even when the taxpayer has proved the identity and genuineness of the investor.
Court Ratio
Legal Principles & Ratio Decidendi
- Onus Discharged: The Calcutta High Court ruled that the NR Portfolio precedent is not applicable where the assessee has successfully proved the investor's identity and creditworthiness.
- Section 68 Limits: The taxpayer is not required to prove the source of the source of funds under Section 68 if the primary transaction is verified and shown to be genuine.
- Genuineness Test: Share premium additions are invalid if the company provides bank statements, PANs, and tax filings of the investing entities.
Key Evidence
Agreements & Filings Evaluated
- Investor PAN & ITR: Income tax returns and PAN details of the shareholders investing the share premium.
- Bank Statement Ledger: Bank records showing the movement of funds through regular banking channels.
- Share Allocation Log: Board resolutions and Form PAS-3 showing the allotment of shares.
Action Points
Practical Mitigation & Compliance Steps
- Collect Shareholder KYC: Obtain ITRs, bank statements, and PANs of all shareholders investing in share premium.
- Discharge Section 68 Onus: Provide investor tax filings and banking channel proof to prove identity and creditworthiness.
- Challenge Unreasonable Onus: Object to additions u/s 68 if the AO demands source-of-source verification despite primary proof being submitted.